Clinical trial
Transpulmonary Assessment for Individualized Lung Optimization in Obese Patients
Recruiting now · Phase 2 · 1 countries · Registry ID NCT07359261
What this study is about
This protocol describes a randomized controlled feasibility vanguard study designed to investigate the implementation and effects of esophageal pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in patients with high body mass index (BMI) mechanically ventilated patients at the Edmonton Zone. The study will enroll 30 patients with body mass index (BMI) \>=30 kg/m2 who require invasive mechanical ventilation, randomizing them in a 1:1 ratio to receive either esophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration or standard care management. The primary objective focuses on establishing the feasibility of conducting a larger definitive trial, while secondary objectives examine differences in applied PEEP levels, respiratory mechanics, and clinical outcomes between groups. The intervention protocol targets end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure of 0-2 cmH2O.
Basic eligibility
Full registry criteria
Treatments and study arms
Esophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration
PEEP titration guided by transpulmonary pressure measurements using esophageal manometry. Esophageal balloon catheter inserted within 4 hours of randomization, positioned at 35-40 cm depth with position verified by cardiac oscillations and occlusion test. PEEP titrated in 2 cmH2O increments targeting end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0-2 cmH2O, with option to target up to 8 cmH2O for severe hypoxemia (P/F \<200). Safety limits enforced: transpulmonary driving pressure \<15 cmH2O, end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure \<20 cmH2O. Measurements performed twice daily. Catheter removed at extubation or day 28.
Standard care PEEP management
PEEP management per institutional standard practice without esophageal pressure monitoring. For patients meeting ARDS criteria, PEEP titrated using ARDSNet low PEEP/FiO2 table. For non-ARDS patients, PEEP titrated to optimize oxygenation while monitoring hemodynamic tolerance and respiratory mechanics per treating clinician judgment.
Primary outcomes
Composite feasibility assessment including: (1) Recruitment rate (patients enrolled per month, target 1-1.5/month); (2) Successful esophageal catheter placement rate in intervention arm; (3) Protocol adherence (percentage of scheduled transpulmonary pressure measurements completed, compliance with PEEP titration algorithm); (4) Data completeness for average PEEP over 7 days.
Study locations
2 locations were listed when this page was built. The first 40 are shown.