Clinical trial
Investigating Metabolic and Psychological Adaptations in a Clinical Trial
Active, not recruiting · Not applicable · 1 countries · Registry ID NCT06800794
What this study is about
This study aims to explore how food insecurity, a lack of consistent access to enough food, may lead to changes in the body that make it harder to lose weight. The investigators are testing whether providing women experiencing food insecurity with a stable, healthy, and personalized meal plan can improve their metabolism and reduce their motivation to eat unhealthy foods. The hypothesis is that addressing food insecurity with a predictable diet can lower a person's respiratory quotient (a measure of how the body uses energy), promote fat burning, and improve overall health. This research will improve the understanding for how food insecurity contributes to obesity and may lead to better solutions for managing weight in individuals facing these challenges.
Basic eligibility
Full registry criteria
Treatments and study arms
Behavioral Skill Training
7 sessions including: Hunger and fullness, eating on a budget, traffic light eating plan, menu planning, creating alternatives to food, financial planning, and changing the environment.
Meal Provisioning
3 meals a day consisting of low energy dense, nutrient rich, ready to eat, low GI, foods delivered to the participants' homes.
Primary outcomes
measured in kgs using a weight scale.
measured via a finger-prick blood sample analyzed using a point-of-care device
will be measured in morning fasting state using the Breezing Pro, an FDA approved device for portable metabolic measures
will be measured in morning fasting state using the Breezing Pro, an FDA approved device for portable metabolic measures
will be measured using the adjusting amount delay discounting task that presents participants with choices between a fraction of the total delayed amount of money now or the full amount ($100 \&/ $1000) at a future delayed time for five different periods from 30 days, 180 days, 365 days (1 year), 1095 days (3 years), 1825 days (5 years) (order randomized).
RRE will be assessed through a survey that will use participants' preferred snack foods that are classified as either hyperpalatable or healthy. Scores have no fixed minimum or maximum, as they are determined by the highest ratio completed before the participant stops working for the food reward. Higher scores indicate greater reinforcing efficacy and a stronger motivational drive for the food reward, which is considered a worse outcome in this context.
Study locations
1 locations were listed when this page was built. The first 40 are shown.