Clinical trial
Obesity Group Visits. A Novel Way to Approach the Obesity Epidemic in an Inner-City Setting
Active, not recruiting · Not applicable · 1 countries · Registry ID NCT04725058
What this study is about
The purpose of this study has two aims: Aim 1: To compare a medical group visit model versus a dietitian-let model (shared composite group visit approach vs individualized dietitian-led approach) to provide obesity care in a real-world diverse inner city population. Aim 2. To use both perivascular fat attenuation and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in those receiving composite group intervention vs. dietitian-led intervention to see if lifestyle intervention can reduce plaque progression and improve perivascular fat attenuation.
Basic eligibility
Full registry criteria
Treatments and study arms
Medical Group Visit
A group of 20 or more participants will receive obesity management through endocrinologist and registered dietitian in a group seetting.
Dietitian Individual Visit
Participant receives obesity management individually from a registered dietitian.
Primary outcomes
Weight will be measured at baseline and at 3,6, and 12 months.
Hemoglobin A1c will be measured at baseline, and at moths 0, 3, 6 and 12 to determine the effect of the intervention arm.
Diet quality will be assessed by the healthy eating Index-2015 score calculated from the food frequency questionnaire using the diet history questionnaire tool (DHQ) version III software. The minimum and maximum scores ranges fron 0 to 100. Higher scores greater than 60 indicate better diet quality.
The IPAQ short form is a seven-item instrument evaluation tool of physical activity among the adults that measures a range of physical activity from vigorous to sedentary over the last 7 days. The specific type of activities assessed are walking, moderate intensity activities and vigorous intensity activities. All continuous scores are expressed in metabolic equivalent minutes(MET-minutes) per week with walking =3.3 METs, Moderate PA=4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. An overall total physical activity score can be computed as the sum of the total MET-minutes/week scores where more MET-minutes per week indicate more physical activity
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) consists of 12-item rating scale for assessing psychological distress over the past few weeks. Scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress.
Change from baseline to 12-month follow-up PRAPARE score. The PRAPARE assessment tool will be used to calculate a tally risk score indicating the cumulative number of SDOH risks a patient faces (including 15 SDOH domains).
Study locations
1 locations were listed when this page was built. The first 40 are shown.